Scope and Contents: Series XXXV, ERA RESCISSION, 1962-1983 (scattered) (#120.1-125.49). Some states, after having passed the ERA, later considered rescinding their support for the amendment. The constitutionality of rescission, as well as that of time extension of the ERA's ratification period, were questions central to Idaho v. Freeman. While defendant-intervenors in that litigation, NOW monitored the legislative elections and activities of states considering rescission. In some instances, the National Office...

Scope and Contents: Series XXXV, ERA RESCISSION, 1962-1983 (scattered) (#120.1-125.49). Some states, after having passed the ERA, later considered rescinding their support for the amendment. The constitutionality of rescission, as well as that of time extension of the ERA's ratification period, were questions central to Idaho v. Freeman. While defendant-intervenors in that litigation, NOW monitored the legislative elections and activities of states considering rescission. In some instances, the National Office...

Scope and Contents: Series XXXV, ERA RESCISSION, 1962-1983 (scattered) (#120.1-125.49). Some states, after having passed the ERA, later considered rescinding their support for the amendment. The constitutionality of rescission, as well as that of time extension of the ERA's ratification period, were questions central to Idaho v. Freeman. While defendant-intervenors in that litigation, NOW monitored the legislative elections and activities of states considering rescission. In some instances, the National Office...

Scope and Contents: Series XXXV, ERA RESCISSION, 1962-1983 (scattered) (#120.1-125.49). Some states, after having passed the ERA, later considered rescinding their support for the amendment. The constitutionality of rescission, as well as that of time extension of the ERA's ratification period, were questions central to Idaho v. Freeman. While defendant-intervenors in that litigation, NOW monitored the legislative elections and activities of states considering rescission. In some instances, the National Office...

Scope and Contents: Series XXXV, ERA RESCISSION, 1962-1983 (scattered) (#120.1-125.49). Some states, after having passed the ERA, later considered rescinding their support for the amendment. The constitutionality of rescission, as well as that of time extension of the ERA's ratification period, were questions central to Idaho v. Freeman. While defendant-intervenors in that litigation, NOW monitored the legislative elections and activities of states considering rescission. In some instances, the National Office...

Scope and Contents: Series XXXV, ERA RESCISSION, 1962-1983 (scattered) (#120.1-125.49). Some states, after having passed the ERA, later considered rescinding their support for the amendment. The constitutionality of rescission, as well as that of time extension of the ERA's ratification period, were questions central to Idaho v. Freeman. While defendant-intervenors in that litigation, NOW monitored the legislative elections and activities of states considering rescission. In some instances, the National Office...

Scope and Contents: Series XXXV, ERA RESCISSION, 1962-1983 (scattered) (#120.1-125.49). Some states, after having passed the ERA, later considered rescinding their support for the amendment. The constitutionality of rescission, as well as that of time extension of the ERA's ratification period, were questions central to Idaho v. Freeman. While defendant-intervenors in that litigation, NOW monitored the legislative elections and activities of states considering rescission. In some instances, the National Office...

Scope and Contents: Series XXXV, ERA RESCISSION, 1962-1983 (scattered) (#120.1-125.49). Some states, after having passed the ERA, later considered rescinding their support for the amendment. The constitutionality of rescission, as well as that of time extension of the ERA's ratification period, were questions central to Idaho v. Freeman. While defendant-intervenors in that litigation, NOW monitored the legislative elections and activities of states considering rescission. In some instances, the National Office...

Scope and Contents: Series XXXV, ERA RESCISSION, 1962-1983 (scattered) (#120.1-125.49). Some states, after having passed the ERA, later considered rescinding their support for the amendment. The constitutionality of rescission, as well as that of time extension of the ERA's ratification period, were questions central to Idaho v. Freeman. While defendant-intervenors in that litigation, NOW monitored the legislative elections and activities of states considering rescission. In some instances, the National Office...

Scope and Contents: Series XXXV, ERA RESCISSION, 1962-1983 (scattered) (#120.1-125.49). Some states, after having passed the ERA, later considered rescinding their support for the amendment. The constitutionality of rescission, as well as that of time extension of the ERA's ratification period, were questions central to Idaho v. Freeman. While defendant-intervenors in that litigation, NOW monitored the legislative elections and activities of states considering rescission. In some instances, the National Office...

Scope and Contents: Series XXXV, ERA RESCISSION, 1962-1983 (scattered) (#120.1-125.49). Some states, after having passed the ERA, later considered rescinding their support for the amendment. The constitutionality of rescission, as well as that of time extension of the ERA's ratification period, were questions central to Idaho v. Freeman. While defendant-intervenors in that litigation, NOW monitored the legislative elections and activities of states considering rescission. In some instances, the National Office...

Scope and Contents: Series XXXV, ERA RESCISSION, 1962-1983 (scattered) (#120.1-125.49). Some states, after having passed the ERA, later considered rescinding their support for the amendment. The constitutionality of rescission, as well as that of time extension of the ERA's ratification period, were questions central to Idaho v. Freeman. While defendant-intervenors in that litigation, NOW monitored the legislative elections and activities of states considering rescission. In some instances, the National Office...

Scope and Contents: Series XXXV, ERA RESCISSION, 1962-1983 (scattered) (#120.1-125.49). Some states, after having passed the ERA, later considered rescinding their support for the amendment. The constitutionality of rescission, as well as that of time extension of the ERA's ratification period, were questions central to Idaho v. Freeman. While defendant-intervenors in that litigation, NOW monitored the legislative elections and activities of states considering rescission. In some instances, the National Office...

Scope and Contents: Series XXXV, ERA RESCISSION, 1962-1983 (scattered) (#120.1-125.49). Some states, after having passed the ERA, later considered rescinding their support for the amendment. The constitutionality of rescission, as well as that of time extension of the ERA's ratification period, were questions central to Idaho v. Freeman. While defendant-intervenors in that litigation, NOW monitored the legislative elections and activities of states considering rescission. In some instances, the National Office...

Scope and Contents: Series XXXV, ERA RESCISSION, 1962-1983 (scattered) (#120.1-125.49). Some states, after having passed the ERA, later considered rescinding their support for the amendment. The constitutionality of rescission, as well as that of time extension of the ERA's ratification period, were questions central to Idaho v. Freeman. While defendant-intervenors in that litigation, NOW monitored the legislative elections and activities of states considering rescission. In some instances, the National Office...

Scope and Contents: Series XXXV, ERA RESCISSION, 1962-1983 (scattered) (#120.1-125.49). Some states, after having passed the ERA, later considered rescinding their support for the amendment. The constitutionality of rescission, as well as that of time extension of the ERA's ratification period, were questions central to Idaho v. Freeman. While defendant-intervenors in that litigation, NOW monitored the legislative elections and activities of states considering rescission. In some instances, the National Office...

Scope and Contents: Series XXXV, ERA RESCISSION, 1962-1983 (scattered) (#120.1-125.49). Some states, after having passed the ERA, later considered rescinding their support for the amendment. The constitutionality of rescission, as well as that of time extension of the ERA's ratification period, were questions central to Idaho v. Freeman. While defendant-intervenors in that litigation, NOW monitored the legislative elections and activities of states considering rescission. In some instances, the National Office...

Scope and Contents: Series XXXV, ERA RESCISSION, 1962-1983 (scattered) (#120.1-125.49). Some states, after having passed the ERA, later considered rescinding their support for the amendment. The constitutionality of rescission, as well as that of time extension of the ERA's ratification period, were questions central to Idaho v. Freeman. While defendant-intervenors in that litigation, NOW monitored the legislative elections and activities of states considering rescission. In some instances, the National Office...

Scope and Contents: Series XXXV, ERA RESCISSION, 1962-1983 (scattered) (#120.1-125.49). Some states, after having passed the ERA, later considered rescinding their support for the amendment. The constitutionality of rescission, as well as that of time extension of the ERA's ratification period, were questions central to Idaho v. Freeman. While defendant-intervenors in that litigation, NOW monitored the legislative elections and activities of states considering rescission. In some instances, the National Office...

Scope and Contents: Series XXXV, ERA RESCISSION, 1962-1983 (scattered) (#120.1-125.49). Some states, after having passed the ERA, later considered rescinding their support for the amendment. The constitutionality of rescission, as well as that of time extension of the ERA's ratification period, were questions central to Idaho v. Freeman. While defendant-intervenors in that litigation, NOW monitored the legislative elections and activities of states considering rescission. In some instances, the National Office...

Scope and Contents: Series XXXV, ERA RESCISSION, 1962-1983 (scattered) (#120.1-125.49). Some states, after having passed the ERA, later considered rescinding their support for the amendment. The constitutionality of rescission, as well as that of time extension of the ERA's ratification period, were questions central to Idaho v. Freeman. While defendant-intervenors in that litigation, NOW monitored the legislative elections and activities of states considering rescission. In some instances, the National Office...

Scope and Contents: Series XXXV, ERA RESCISSION, 1962-1983 (scattered) (#120.1-125.49). Some states, after having passed the ERA, later considered rescinding their support for the amendment. The constitutionality of rescission, as well as that of time extension of the ERA's ratification period, were questions central to Idaho v. Freeman. While defendant-intervenors in that litigation, NOW monitored the legislative elections and activities of states considering rescission. In some instances, the National Office...

Scope and Contents: Series XXXV, ERA RESCISSION, 1962-1983 (scattered) (#120.1-125.49). Some states, after having passed the ERA, later considered rescinding their support for the amendment. The constitutionality of rescission, as well as that of time extension of the ERA's ratification period, were questions central to Idaho v. Freeman. While defendant-intervenors in that litigation, NOW monitored the legislative elections and activities of states considering rescission. In some instances, the National Office...

Scope and Contents: Series XXXV, ERA RESCISSION, 1962-1983 (scattered) (#120.1-125.49). Some states, after having passed the ERA, later considered rescinding their support for the amendment. The constitutionality of rescission, as well as that of time extension of the ERA's ratification period, were questions central to Idaho v. Freeman. While defendant-intervenors in that litigation, NOW monitored the legislative elections and activities of states considering rescission. In some instances, the National Office...

Scope and Contents: Series XXXV, ERA RESCISSION, 1962-1983 (scattered) (#120.1-125.49). Some states, after having passed the ERA, later considered rescinding their support for the amendment. The constitutionality of rescission, as well as that of time extension of the ERA's ratification period, were questions central to Idaho v. Freeman. While defendant-intervenors in that litigation, NOW monitored the legislative elections and activities of states considering rescission. In some instances, the National Office...